Mayor Under Siege: Allegation of Nepotism and Corruption Threaten Mpe's Reign
- Mpho Dube
- Jul 25
- 4 min read

Polokwane Municipality Mayor John Mpe
Polokwane Municipality Mayor John Mpe's administration has been rocked by scandals in recent weeks, with allegations of tender irregularities, nepotism, and favoritism sparking widespread criticism and calls for greater transparency and accountability in governance.
A social media post alleging that Municipal Manager Thuso Nemugumoni's romantic partner's company was awarded a R56.3 million tender improperly has further fueled the controversy, leaving many to wonder about the integrity of the municipality's decision-making processes.
However, Mpe vehemently denied these allegations during a press conference on Thursday in Polokwane, stating that they were a political witch hunt.
Additionally, Mpe has faced criticism over that the tender in question was awarded to a Zimbabwean company owned by Nemugumoni's boyfriend , with some accusing Mpe and his administration of favoring foreign nationals. Mpe has defended the decision, citing the 50/50 partnership between a South African company and the Zimbabwean company.
Mayor Mpe's claims of a political witch hunt against him have also raised serious questions about the legitimacy of his administration's actions and the potential politicization of municipal governance. Critics argue that his assertions of a witch hunt are an attempt to deflect attention from the substance of the allegations, rather than addressing the concerns about tender irregularities and nepotism.
Many are left wondering whether Mpe's administration is more focused on protecting its own interests than serving the people of Polokwane. The controversy has sparked a heated debate about the role of politics in municipal governance and the need for transparency and accountability in the administration of public resources.
Mpe who had a hectic Thursday appeared on national news channel Newsroom Africa and other radio stations to defuse the serious allegations that have raised eyebrows in the Limpopo community, particularly in the Capricorn Region. He claimed that his detractors and political nemeses were spreading propaganda aimed at destroying him and his reputation.
Mpe and his communication team maintained that the tender was awarded fairly and that the allegations are baseless.
In response to the allegations, the municipality has emphasized its commitment to transparency, inclusion, and progress. The leadership has urged individuals with credible evidence of fraud, corruption, or maladministration to bring it forward to relevant law enforcement agencies.
The controversy surrounding Mpe's administration has raised questions about the role of politics in municipal decision-making and the importance of maintaining public trust. As the investigation unfolds, the community will be watching closely to see how the municipality addresses these concerns and works to restore public confidence.
However, Mpe's detractors are skeptical of his claims, with many pointing to the old adage "where there's smoke, there's fire." They argue that the sheer number of allegations and controversies surrounding Mpe's administration suggest that there may be some truth to the claims.
In addition to the tender scandal, Mpe's decision to employ people permanently without engaging the council has sparked further controversy. The opposition parties, including the DA, have called him out for this move, which they claim undermines the council's authority.
The DA has also raised concerns about political interference in the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP) recruitment process in Polokwane Municipality. The party has written to the municipal manager, expressing deep concern about Mpe's comments during a public event, where he seemingly promised EPWP opportunities to all individuals present.
The party argues that this undermines the principles of merit, transparency, and equal access that the EPWP stands for. The DA has called on the municipality to publicly release the EPWP recruitment criteria and selection procedures and to implement an independent oversight mechanism to monitor fairness in the application of the EPWP policy.
Despite the controversy, Mpe remains resolute in his defense of his administration's actions. He has called on the public to reject the smear campaigns and to focus on the municipality's delivery and reform efforts.
As the controversy continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the people of Polokwane are watching closely to see how this situation plays out. Will Mpe's administration emerge unscathed, or will the allegations prove to be its downfall? Only time will tell.
The municipality has confirmed that it follows all applicable procedures and regulations in awarding tenders and implementing policies. The city manager, Thuso Nemugumoni, has assured the public that the municipality is committed to transparency and accountability.
However, the opposition parties and civil society organizations are not convinced. They argue that the municipality's actions are not transparent and that the public has a right to know how their money is being spent.
As the debate rages on, one thing is certain: the people of Polokwane deserve answers. They deserve to know whether their municipality is being run in a transparent and accountable manner. They deserve to know whether the allegations against Mpe and his administration are true or false.
The municipality's leadership must take the public into their confidence and provide them with the necessary information. Transparency and accountability are essential in building trust between the municipality and the public.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Mayor Mpe's administration highlights the need for transparency and accountability in local government. The people of Polokwane have a right to know how their municipality is being run and whether the allegations against Mpe and his administration are true or false. The municipality's leadership must take steps to address these concerns and provide the public with the necessary information.




Comments